Who pays for the time it takes to do a coronavirus lateral flow test?
The government has confirmed that dozens of public and private sector employers have joined its scheme to offer workplace rapid testing to employees without coronavirus symptoms who cannot work from home. These lateral flow tests give results in 30 minutes. However, who pays for the waiting time?

Where workplace rapid testing has been implemented employees will be asked to take a lateral flow test a couple of times a week. They then need to wait 30 minutes for their result, and normally they wouldn’t start work until that result is available. It’s highly unlikely the employer will have explicitly covered this type of waiting time in employment contracts. If that’s the case and they can’t otherwise contractually require employees to work overtime, then they should allow them to attend for lateral flow tests and wait for their results during their normal working hours, e.g. at the start of their shift rather than pre-shift, unless they expressly agree to come in earlier. If the employer can contractually require employees to work overtime, and wants them to come in pre-shift to do the test and wait for the results under those overtime provisions, then they should pay for any additional time here in accordance with those provisions (or grant time off in lieu if the employer allows for that). Likewise, if the employees expressly consent to come in pre-shift, the employer should agree to pay them to do so (or again agree time off in lieu), although they don’t have to agree to higher overtime rates.
Where contractual overtime is unpaid, which is frequently the case with salaried employees, employers need to be careful to ensure compliance with national minimum wage (NMW) legislation, particularly if the employee is paid at or close to NMW rates. This is because standby time at or near the workplace and overtime both count as working time for NMW purposes. Once a salaried hours worker who isn’t paid for these additional standby or overtime hours has worked for more than their basic annual hours in the year, it’s necessary to check that all the additional hours are taken into account when checking that at least the NMW rates have been paid. This shouldn’t affect anyone who is paid significantly in excess of NMW rates though.
Related Topics
-
Should you revoke your 20-year-old option?
Your business has let out a building to a tenant and it is now just over 20 years since you opted to tax the property with HMRC. Should you revoke it so that your tenant no longer needs to pay VAT?
-
Chip shop owner fined £40k for hiring illegal worker
A Surrey fish and chip shop owner has been left in shock after being fined £40,000 for allegedly employing someone who didn’t have the right to work in the UK, even though he conducted a right to work check. Where did this employer go wrong and what can you learn from it?
-
Change to IHT on pensions proposals
HMRC has published a policy statement announcing an important change to its plans to include pension savings in an individual's estate for inheritance tax (IHT) purposes. What’s the full story?