New government-backed loan scheme launched
The Recovery Loan Scheme (RLS) announced in this year’s Spring Budget opened for business on 6 April. What does it offer, who’s eligible and how can a business apply?

The Chancellor’s announcement in March promised that the RLS would be open to all businesses of any size that needed loans or other kinds of finance to help them recover from the financial effects of the pandemic. The finance can be for up to £10 million and is provided by banks and other accredited lenders. It can take one or more of the following forms:
- loans
- overdrafts
- invoice finance
- asset finance
- guarantees
If the borrowing is up to £250,000 the lender won’t require any form of personal guarantee. For larger amounts the RLS provides a government guarantee on up to 20% of the debt. The annual cost for interest and finance related fees won’t be more than 14.99%, but can be less.
The scheme is open to all businesses including those which have already borrowed through other coronavirus loan schemes. A business can apply for RLS finance until 31 December 2021. This deadline will be reviewed by the government nearer the time.
To find more information about the scheme and access it contact should be made with one of the accredited lenders, details of which can be found on the British Business Bank website here.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?