Match of the Day for HMRC?
HMRC has been targeting media personalities with the IR35 rules, with partial success. Two more high profile cases have been heard. Who were the winners and losers?

The IR35 rules kick in where a worker provides their services through an intermediary, usually, but not always a limited company. Significant tax and NI savings can be realised if this structure is successful. However, HMRC often views such engagements as a sham with the worker being an employee in all but name. The IR35 rules apply if, in the absence of the intermediary, the worker would be an employee of the engaging entity. A number of high profile media personalities have had their employment statuses challenged in recent years.
Gary Lineker has presented Match of the Day for the BBC since 1999. He has also undertaken occasional work for BT Sports. His tax affairs came under the spotlight when it was reported that HMRC was pursuing him for a sum in the region of £5 million. The decision of the First-tier Tribunal (FTT) was that the contracts were made directly between Mr Lineker and the engaging partners in his capacity as a partner of a general partnership. He had correctly declared his income as a share of partnership income (less a fixed allocation to his partner). As there was a direct contract, IR35 could not apply to the arrangement.
The news for Eamonn Holmes was less cheering. The Upper Tribunal has upheld the FTT’s decision that his arrangements were inside IR35; largely due to the degree of control the engager (ITV) had over the format and content of the shows Mr Holmes presented.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?