HMRC issues reminder about loss relief extension
There is a temporary extension to the rules regarding the carry back of corporation tax trading losses due to the coronavirus pandemic. HMRC has just issued a reminder that some companies can speed up the claim for relief. What are the key points?

Corporation tax trading losses can generally be offset against other profits of the same accounting period, carried forward to offset future profits, or carried back to be offset in the previous accounting period. Due to the coronavirus pandemic, the carry back period is extended to three years for losses realised in accounting periods ending between 1 April 2020 and 31 March 2022. In general, this will be claimed via the corporation tax return, but HMRC has just issued a reminder that there is an alternative method available for smaller losses.
If the loss doesn’t exceed £200,000, the company can make the claim via an online form. This can be done as soon as the loss can be accurately established after the end of the accounting period. This means that where there is a delay in filing the corporation tax return, the relief can be claimed immediately. The form is available via the Government Gateway, and can be accessed here (log in details required). Evidence of the loss, e.g. management accounts will need to be provided.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?