Furlough scheme: has employers’ NI been overclaimed?
The Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales (ICAEW) has issued new guidance that describes two scenarios where employers using the furlough scheme may have inadvertently reclaimed secondary Class 1 NI twice when the scheme was first introduced. What’s the full story?
The Coronavirus Job Retention Scheme (CJRS) is complex, but broadly employers pay a percentage of an employee's regular salary (at least 80% in 2020), subject to a cap, then reclaim the 80% element from HMRC. However, it also allows secondary Class 2 NI contributions to be reclaimed, as well as pension contributions under auto-enrolment. This has led to some scenarios where employers who claim the employment allowance (EA) of up to £4,000 per year inadvertently receiving furlough payments in respect of NI that is also relieved under the EA. The ICAEW has published detailed commentary on where this may have happened. In brief, an overclaim may occur where:
- EA claims were deferred until after the final claim month for the CJRS where the £4,000 was not absorbed in full during 2020/21; or
- EA claims were made at the beginning of the tax year where the full £4,000 was absorbed before July 2020.
Potentially affected business should carefully read the guidance and contact HMRC’s Employer Helpline on 0300 200 3200 if they think there is an issue.
Related Topics
-
Was a company buyback of EIS shares tax avoidance?
Two taxpayers used the “purchase of own shares” procedure to extract gains they’d made from enterprise investment scheme (EIS) shares. HMRC said this was unfair tax avoidance, the taxpayers disagreed. What did the Upper Tribunal decide?
-
HMRC’s new compliance check service
HMRC has published a collection of videos and notes to help if you’re picked for a compliance check. Is HMRC’s new service worth a look or is it just official propaganda?
-
Income sharing trouble for separated couple
After a couple separated one spouse received income from letting the property she jointly owned with her estranged spouse. HMRC taxed all the income on her. Was it right to do so or should her spouse have been taxed on half the income?
This website uses both its own and third-party cookies to analyze our services and navigation on our website in order to improve its contents (analytical purposes: measure visits and sources of web traffic). The legal basis is the consent of the user, except in the case of basic cookies, which are essential to navigate this website.